(HC) Fritz v. State of CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMAL D. FRITZ, No. 2:24-cv-02563-DAD-AC 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HABEAS PETITION 15 Respondent. (Doc. No. 5) 16 17 18 Petitioner Jamal D. Fritz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 19 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On November 13, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 22 recommendations recommending that petitioner’s federal habeas petition be summarily dismissed 23 based on a lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 5.) The magistrate judge noted that in the petition 24 pending before the court petitioner challenges his underlying state court conviction on the ground 25 that he is eligible for resentencing and the dismissal of enhancements under Assembly Bill 26 (“A.B.”) 600 due to…