(PS) Alfaro Brittany v. The Studio @ Hotel Berry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20252:24-cv-03395California409 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHELLA C. ALFARO BRITTANY, Case No. 2:24-cv-3395-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 THE STUDIO @ HOTEL BERRY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 28, 2025, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 18 pauperis be denied since the petition failed to demonstrate that she had insufficient assets to pay 19 the filing fee and provide the necessities of life to herself and her dependents. ECF No. 3. 20 Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 2. I also recommended that plaintiff 21 be directed to tender the filing fee within twenty-one days of any order adopting these 22 recommendations. Id. 23 Plaintiff neither filed objections nor tendered the filing fee. On March 31, 2025, the 24 district judge adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to tender the filing 25 fee within twenty-one days.1 ECF No. 4. The deadline to tender the filing fee has expired, and 26 plaintiff has failed to comply. 27

28 1 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.