(PC) Abreu v. Shasta County Sheriff's Office

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BLUE F.C. ABREU, No. 2: 25-cv-0813 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff 19 seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 8, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed 20 with leave to amend. On April 18, 2025, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Amended 21 Complaint.” (ECF No. 13.) However, plaintiff’s filing is more in the nature of a letter objecting 22 to the Court’s screening order. Therefore, as discussed below, plaintiff’s “amended complaint” is 23 dismissed, and plaintiff is granted an extension of time to file a second amended complaint or, if 24 he prefers, he may voluntarily dismiss this action. 25 I. PLAINTIFF’S “AMENDED COMPLAINT” 26 Plaintiff objects that his original complaint brought to the Court’s attention alleged 27 “corruption, domestic human trafficking, falsified arrest reports, lack of crime scene…