Robinson

facts that are capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned). See Laster v. USA, No. 2:24-cv-3312 DJC CKD (E.D. Cal.) (§ 1983); Laster v. State of California, No. 2:24-cv-3708 DAD DMC (E.D. Cal.) (§ 1983); Laster v. Robinson, No. 2:25-cv- 0966 JDP (E.D. Cal.) (§ 1983); Laster v. Beavers, No. 2:25-cv-0968 EFB (E.D. Cal.) (§ 1983); Laster v. Cheatley, No. 2:25-cv-0979 CSK (E.D. Cal.) (§ 1983); Laster v. Mimmick, 2:25-cv- 1134 CSK (E.D. Cal.) (§ 1983); Laster v. Wentz, No. 2:25-cv-1135 EFB (E.D. Cal.) (§ 1983); Laster v. USA, 2:25-cv-0440 DC CSK (E.D. Cal.) (habeas); 2: Laster v. State of California, 2:25- cv-0481 DAD SCR (E.D. Cal.) (habeas); Laster v. Cheatley, No. 2:25-cv-1098 EFB (E.D. Cal.) (habeas); Laster v. Robinson, No. 2:25-cv-1099 AC (E.D. Cal.) (habeas); Laster v. Beavers, No. 2:25-cv-1172 CKD (E.D. Cal.) (habeas). On April 11, 2024, the court received several documents from petitioner: (1) a statement of consent; (2) an application to proceed in forma pauperis; (3) a request for conformed copies; (4) a letter explaining that plaintiff has filed multiple applications to proceed…