Adreana

(PC) Hasbrook v. Adreana

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20252:25-cv-01131California4,627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE MATTHEW HASBROOK, No. 2:25-cv-1131 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. AUDREE ADREANA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, is currently housed in the Sacramento Mental Health Treatment Center. On April 17, 2025, plaintiff filed a letter stating he wishes to “initiate a junction of a Supreme Court Justice System, of a federal court system,” and wants to show all videos of all officers of the Sheriff’s Department. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) As discussed below, plaintiff’s filing is insufficient to constitute a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, or a motion for injunctive relief. In addition, plaintiff failed to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or pay the court’s filing fee. Therefore, plaintiff is granted thirty days to file (1) a civil rights complaint, and (2) an application to proceed in forma pauperis and inmate trust account statement, or pay the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.