P

P v. Obregon CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 2013C070695California2,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/4/13 P v. Obregon CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE, C070695

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. CRF102348,

CRF073877)

v.

RAYMOND GARDUNO OBREGON,

Defendant and Appellant.

This is an appeal after remand for a hearing on whether defendant Raymond Garduno Obregon is entitled to additional custody credit for time spent in residential treatment and for time spent in custody as a sentenced prisoner. In People v. Obregon (Jan. 12, 2012, C066722) [nonpub. opn.] (Obregon I), after defense appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), defendant filed a supplemental brief.1 He contended, inter alia, that he was entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.