Sundquist

Sundquist v. Bank of America CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2013C070291California10,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/5/13 Sundquist v. Bank of America CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

ERIK SUNDQUIST et al., C070291

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. SCV0029401)

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

In this action, plaintiffs Erik and Renee Sundquist sued Bank of America and various other defendants for the consequences of a home loan they could not afford. The trial court sustained the demurrer of three defendants without leave to amend. On appeal, we conclude the court erred in sustaining the demurrer as to some of the causes of action. Accordingly, we will reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Sundquists are a married couple. In July 2008, they wanted to move to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.