The People v. Shiringoharian CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2013B239721California6,112 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

The information The District Attorney of Los Angeles County filed an amended information against defendant on January 16, 2012. Count 1 alleged that defendant committed grand theft auto of a gray 2006 BMW (Pen. Code, § 666.5).1 The gray 2006 BMW belonged to Alison Austin (Austin). In count 2, defendant was charged with receiving Austin’s BMW after it had been stolen (§ 666.5).2 Count 3 charged defendant with receiving stolen property in violation of section 496, subdivision (a). That property was a desktop computer belonging to Austin, checks belonging to Cheryl Paller (Paller), Triple A cards belonging to Jerry Kay (Kay), a driver’s license belonging to Erik Olsen (Olsen), a driver’s license and social security

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

2 Section 666.5, subdivision (a) increases the base term for a second felony theft of automobile. (People v. Demara (1995) 41 Cal.App.4th 448, 452.) The statute provides in part: “Every person who, having been previously convicted of a felony violation of Section 10851 of the Vehicle Code, or felony grand theft involving an automobile in violation of subdivision (d) of Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.