The People v. Pereira CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2013B245444California673 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/5/13 P. v. Pereira CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B245444

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LA071260) v.

NATASHA JEAN PEREIRA,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:*

Natasha Jean Pereira (Pereira) appeals from an order revoking her probation. Her appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) stating that there are no arguable issues. On May 7, 2013, we notified Pereira of her counsel’s brief and gave her leave to file, within 30 days, a brief or letter identifying arguments that we should consider. That time has elapsed and Pereira has submitted no letter or brief. After review of the record,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.