Grisham

Grisham v. Notre Dame De Namur University CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 2013A135765MCalifornia6,991 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/6/13 Grisham v. Notre Dame De Namur University CA1/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CHARLES CURTIS GRISHAM, JR.,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A135765

v. NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR (San Mateo County UNIVERSITY, Super. Ct. No. CIV501683) Defendant and Respondent. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND

DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT1:

The opinion filed August 13, 2013, is hereby modified as follows:

1. On page 4, the first two sentences of the first full paragraph shall be modified to read as follows: A meeting was held on April 30, 2007. In attendance were plaintiff, his ombudsman appointed by the University, Dean Rossi, and Dr. Chang.

2.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.