Moye

Moye v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 202523-3601California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 29 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDON MOYE Sr., No. 23-3601 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:21-cv-00535-MO v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 29, 2025**

Before: WALLLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Brandon Moye, Sr. appeals pro se the district court’s affirmance of the

Social Security agency’s decision granting his application for disability insurance

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social

Security Act. We review de novo, Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.

2012), and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.