People v. Ramirez CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2025G063907California1,279 words

Opinion

Opinion

Delaney, J.

Filed 4/29/25 P. v. Ramirez CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063907

v. (Super. Ct. No. SWF2100695)

ROBERTO ANDRES RAMIREZ, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a prejudgment order of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Jeffrey M. Zimel, Judge. Affirmed. Stephanie M. Adraktas, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent. Michael A. Hestrin, Riverside County District Attorney, Janinda Gunawardene, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant. After Respondent Roberto Andres Ramirez was charged with robbery, he filed a written motion pursuant to Penal Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.