People v. Moten CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2025D084503California131 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Moten’s appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case and statement of facts, urging no grounds for reversal of the judgment, and asking this court to independently review the record for error. Counsel identifies the following issue to assist the court in its review: Was there substantial evidence to show Moten violated the terms of his parole by absconding from parole supervision? We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Moten on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order revoking Moten’s parole is affirmed.

DO, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

KELETY, J.

RUBIN, J.

3