Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. Diaz

Good Law
729 F.3d 1225·2013 WL 4792941·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18776
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 201310-56104California6,591 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

State prisoner Armando Jose Sossa, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court challenging the constitutionality of his second degree robbery conviction. The district court dismissed the petition on the ground that it was untimely. We hold that Sossa is entitled to equitable tolling on the ground that he relied on the assigned magistrate judge’s order extending the filing deadline beyond the statutory limitation. We further hold that Sossa has sufficiently alleged that he was precluded from filing his habeas petition within the time period provided in the magistrate judge’s order to warrant further development of the record. Therefore, we reverse the district court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

Sossa was convicted of second degree burglary in 2004. He was sentenced to thirty-five years to life, and the California Court of Appeal affirmed his conviction and sentence. On November 2, 2005, the California Supreme Court denied Sossa’s petition for review. For purpose of the one-year limitations period of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(1)(A), Sossa’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.