Vincent Aseervatham v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
540 F. App'x 582
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 201310-73666California237 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Petitioner Vincent Aseervatham petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Because the parties are familiar with the history of the case, we need not recount it here.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Aseervatham provided material support to a terrorist organization and is therefore ineligible for asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI). Aseervat-ham provided computer support for the Liberation Tiger Tamil Eelam, a designated terrorist organization. Communications support is among the examples given in the statute of prohibited support activities. Id. Aseervatham’s claim that the statute does not apply because he acted under duress is foreclosed by Annachamy v. Holder, 733 F.3d 254, 266-67 , 2013 WL 4405687, at *9 (9th Cir. July 3, 2012).

Aseervatham’s departure from the United States has rendered moot his claims for withholding of removal and CAT relief. 8 CFR §§ 1241.7 ,1208.16(f).

PETITION DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.