Armando Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
730 F.3d 900·2013 WL 4865431·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19004
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 201311-71788California1,399 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armando “Lupita” Gutierrez appeals from the denial of her request for withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In a separate memorandum disposition filed concurrently with this opinion, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board of Immigration Appeal’s determination that she is not likely to be tortured if she is returned to Mexico. We issue this per curiam opinion to clarify that the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) may seek to terminate a prior grant of withholding of removal in conjunction with removal proceedings as long as the DHS meets its burden of demonstrating the grounds for doing so. We hold that two separate proceedings are not required pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1208.24 (f).

Ms. Gutierrez was born in Mexico in 1970 and entered the United States without permission in 1999. In July 2007, an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) issued an order denying her asylum but granting her withholding of removal.

The DHS subsequently learned that Ms. Gutierrez had been convicted in August 2007 in a California court for transporting and distributing cocaine, and sentenced to four years in prison. It also discovered that previously, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.