In re B. M. CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2013H039064California10,060 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

I. Initial April 2012 Petition and Detention Order

On April 5, 2012, the Department filed a petition alleging that the parents had failed to protect the minor and that she had been left without any provision for support. (§ 300, subds. (b), (g).) The Department alleged, inter alia, that both parents had untreated or undertreated substance abuse issues; Father was on federal probation related to drug trafficking; Father had beaten Mother and choked her until she was unconscious, Mother believing at the time that he was going to kill her; and both parents had left the minor in the care of her maternal grandmother, J.R., a woman who had had an extensive child welfare history that included substantiated substance abuse and physical abuse.

2 On April 6, 2012, the court ordered the minor detained pursuant to section 319, subdivision (a). The court ordered that Mother be permitted supervised visitation of the minor at a minimum of three times per week.

II. May 2012 Jurisdiction/Disposition Report

In its May 2012 jurisdiction/disposition report, the Department reported that after the minor was detained by court order on April 6, 2012, she was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.