Larry Beauchamp v. City of Long Beach

Good Law
730 F.3d 986·2013 WL 5188812·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19181
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 201311-55780California3,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

We respectfully request that the Supreme Court of California exercise its discretion to decide the certified questions set forth in Part II of this order.

I

Caption and Counsel

A. The caption of the case is:

B. The names and addresses of counsel for the parties are:

C.Designation of party to be deemed petitioner: Plaintiff-Appellant

II

Question Certified

Pursuant to Rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, before which this appeal is pending, requests that the Supreme Court of California answer the question presented below. This court will accept the California Supreme Court’s decision on this question. Our phrasing of the question is not intended to restrict the California Supreme Court’s consideration of the case. The question certified is as follows.

Ill

Statement of Facts

Larry Beauchamp, a resident of Long Beach and a quadriplegic, sued the City of Long Beach on February 19, 2010, for maintaining inaccessible sidewalks, curbs, and curb ramps in violation of sections 51, 54, 54.1, and 54.3 of the California Civil Code (among other claims). The district court determined that Beauchamp was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.