Steven Phillips v. Debra Herndon

Good Law
730 F.3d 773·2013 WL 5184270·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19178
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 201309-56079California2,391 words

Opinion

Opinion

Korman, J.

Steven Wayne Phillips, along with one of his accomplices, Robert Cress, was found guilty of the murder of William Jacob. Phillips alone was found guilty of personally discharging a firearm in the course of the murder. He was sentenced to twenty-five years to life for murder and also subjected to a mandatory consecutive sentence of twenty-five years to life for the firearm enhancement under California Penal Code § 12022.53(d). The exclusion of Cress’s third-party confession exculpating Phillips as the shooter, the sole issue raised on this appeal, affects only the latter conviction because Phillips’s conviction for murder did not turn on his use of the firearm.

The evidence at trial established that, shortly after the crime, Phillips admitted shooting Jacob, and other evidence placed the gun in his hands. Cress also said twice that Phillips was the shooter. Nevertheless, the following morning Cress changed his story and said that he was the shooter. The trial judge excluded all of Cress’s statements. Specifically, the trial judge found that while Cress’s own admission of guilt was against his penal interest, it lacked sufficient indicia of trustworthiness to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.