In re E.Z. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2013G047605California3,021 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/17/13 In re E.Z. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re E.Z., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

G047605

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. ST001172) v.

OPINION

E.Z., a Minor,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kimberly Menninger, Judge. Affirmed as modified. Richard Jay Moller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Meagan J. Beale and William M. Wood, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * * E.Z. was found to come within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6011 due to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.