EHP Glendale v. Co. of Los Angeles

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2013B244494California10,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

Flier, J.

FACTS

We set forth the background facts from our prior opinion, which have not changed (EHP Glendale, supra, 193 Cal.App.4th at pp. 264-268 [all footnotes in original]):1 “1. The Subject Property “The property at issue is located near the intersection of Brand Boulevard and Glenoaks Boulevard in the City of Glendale (City). The 18-story structure, built in 1991, is operated as a full-service first-class hotel with 351 guestrooms, including 13 suites. The hotel encompasses about 285,000 square feet of improvements, including a lobby, administrative offices, hotel laundry, two ballrooms, a „prefunction‟ area, seven meeting rooms, a business center, a fitness facility, a gift shop, an outdoor pool and spa with sundeck, two restaurants, a lounge, kitchen facilities and an approximately 196,000- square-foot, five-level, below-grade parking garage accommodating over 500 vehicles.

We add any additional facts as needed in the Discussion part.

2 “2. Hotel Sale and Purchase “In January 2005, the Hilton Hotels Corporation (Hilton) offered the hotel for sale. Hilton marketed the property as being located in a prime location, distant from competing Hilton hotels, relatively insulated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.