Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of Alameda

Good Law
730 F.3d 1111·2013 WL 5273097
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 201311-17391, 11-17496California7,391 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

This appeal stems from the City of Alameda’s offering of municipal bonds to finance the development of a cable and Internet system. Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund, the Nuveen Municipal Trust for the Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund, and Pacific Specialty Insurance Company (collectively, “Nuveen”) purchased about twenty million dollars worth of the bonds and then lost money on the bonds when the City sold the system several years later. Nuveen brought federal and state securities claims against the City, alleging that the City misrepresented the risks to investors. We affirm the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the City.

For its federal claims under Section 10b-5 and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Nuveen has not shown a triable issue of fact on the issue of loss causation. Nuveen’s theory that it would not have purchased the securities but for the City’s alleged misrepresentation of the risks goes only to show reliance, or transaction causation. Missing is the necessary link between the claimed misrepresentations and the economic loss Nu-veen suffered.

Although Nuveen pitches its appeal as novel because the notes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.