Shanley

Shanley v. Shanley CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2013D062551California12,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/19/13 Shanley v. Shanley CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE GAIL SHANLEY, D062551

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2009-00150081-

PR-TR-NC)

KIRK LEE SHANLEY,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard G.

Cline, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Rosemary Leonard and Rosemary Meagher-Leonard for Plaintiff

and Appellant.

Alspaugh & Alspaugh, George A. Alspaugh, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant Denise Shanley appeals the judgment entered after a bench

trial. She contends the trial court prejudicially erred when it (i) excluded the testimony of

an expert witness she untimely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.