Gatlin

Gatlin v. Contra Costa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20253:21-cv-00370California3,008 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDISON GATLIN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00370-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING COUNTY

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 176 Defendants.

12 County Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings as to the case plan allegations contained in the Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action in plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 176. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for May 2, 2025. 17 BACKGROUND The factual and procedural background of this case are described more fully in the Court’s prior order concerning the motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 129. This order does not recount the allegations in full except as necessary to resolve the pending motion. To summarize, this case is brought by Edison Gatlin, a deceased…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.