Floyd

Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20253:24-cv-01278California620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-01278-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. SANCTIONS AND GRANTING

MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY

SABER FITNESS HEGENBERGER, LLC, DEADLINE Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 92, 101

12 Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd moves for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, including monetary sanctions, evidence exclusion, and entry of default judgment against Defendant Saber Fitness Hegenberger LLC, based on Defendant’s alleged failure to comply with its discovery obligations. ECF No. 92. Plaintiff argues sanctions are necessary in part because this case was filed in state court almost two years ago, yet “none of [his] discovery requests have been adequately answered.” Mot. at 1-2. However, after Defendant removed the case to this Court on March 1, 2024, no case management order was issued until December 6, after the Court addressed several rounds of motions, including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.