Regal

Regal v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20255:22-cv-04321California2,820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 DEVIN REGAL, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04321-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION FOR A SCHEDULING

ORDER MODIFICATION AND FOR

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, LEAVE TO AMEND Defendant. [Re: Dkt. No. 132]

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Devin Regal, E.R., and C.R.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for a Scheduling Order Modification and for Leave to Amend. Dkt. No. 132 (“Mot.”). Defendant County of Santa Clara (“the County”) opposes the motion, Dkt. No. 136 (“Opp.”), and Plaintiffs filed a reply in support of their motion, Dkt. No. 140 (“Reply”). The Court previously determined that this motion was suitable for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for June 26, 2025. Dkt. No. 135. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion (Dkt. No. 132). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs initially filed this lawsuit on July 26,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.