Pacific Shores Properties, LLC v. City of Newport Beach

Good Law
730 F.3d 1142·2013 WL 5289100
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 201311-55460, 11-55461California15,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Prior to 2008, “group homes”—i.e., homes in which recovering alcoholics and drug users live communally and mutually support each other’s recovery—were generally permitted to locate in residential zones in the City of Newport Beach (“the City”) and they did so freely. By 2008, a number of residents of the City launched a campaign to restrict or eliminate group homes in their neighborhoods. After enacting several moratoria, the City enacted an Ordinance (“the Ordinance”) which had the practical effect of prohibiting new group homes from opening in most residential zones. Even in the few areas where they were permitted to open, new group homes were required to submit to a permit process. Existing group homes also had to undergo the same permit process in order to continue their operations. Among the factors to be considered when granting or denying a permit to any group home was the number of other such facilities in the neighborhood.

On its face, the Ordinance did not single out group homes; persons recovering from addiction are protected from housing discrimination under state and federal anti-discrimination laws. Instead, the Ordinance facially imposed restrictions on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.