Joseph Petitt v. Sause Brothers

Good Law
730 F.3d 1173·2013 WL 5289154·2013 A.M.C. 2570·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19385
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 201312-70740California1,451 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hurwitz, J.

The question presented is whether, under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), scheduled wage increases unrelated to the merits of a worker’s performance constitute an increase in the worker’s wage-earning capacity or merely a general increase in wages. We hold that they are a general increase.

I.

Joseph Petitt injured his back in 2003 while earning $15 per hour as a welder for Sause Brothers (“Sause”). After undergoing two surgeries, Petitt briefly returned to his job, but, physically unable to continue, left Sause at the end of 2004. Sause then began paying Petitt permanent total disability benefits under the LHWCA, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 .

Three years later, Petitt began working as an electronics assembler at K & K Sound Systems (“K & K”), earning $7.80 per hour. K & K provides all production and clerical employees, including assemblers, an automatic $0.25 per hour raise every three months until their wages reach $13.50 per hour.

When Petitt began work at K & K, Sause began paying him only permanent partial disability benefits based on his starting salary. Sause periodically reduced those benefits to reflect each quarterly increase. Petitt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.