Estrada

Estrada v. Real Time Resolutions Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20255:25-cv-02782California1,832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BYRON ESTRADA, Case No. 25-cv-02782-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS INC., et al., EMERGENCY MOTION TO REMAND Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 8, 17]

13 This lawsuit is brought by pro se Plaintiff Byron Estrada (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants 14 Real Time Resolutions Inc. (“Real Time”) and Direct Default Services, LLC (“Direct Default”) 15 (collectively, “Defendants”). In the Complaint, Plaintiff asserts the following claims against both 16 Defendants: 1) violation of the Truth in Lending Act; 2) violation of the Federal Fair Debt 17 Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection 18 Practices Act, Civil Code §§ 17898 et seq.; 3) promissory estoppel; 4) unfair business practices in 19 violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.