Soto

(PC) Cole v. Soto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20251:25-cv-00460California1,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KORRELL SANTANA COLE, No. 1:25-cv-00460 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY HIS APPLICATION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD

NOT BE DENIED AND THIS MATTER NOT

SOTO, et al., BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES (ECF No. 7) PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE DUE

IN FOURTEEN DAYS

19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 20 has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. The matter 21 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 22 Rule 302. 23 For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to show cause why this matter 24 should not be summarily dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and why his 25 application to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.