Freeman

Freeman v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20253:25-cv-00104California789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH FREEMAN, Case No.: 25cv0104 DMS (MSB) Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

vs. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS, (2) DENYING

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ALBERTO

MOTION TO SEAL, (3)

ZARAGOZA, DANIEL NEIFER,

GRANTING MOTION FOR

GARRETT EDWARD SHEEHAN,

LEAVE TO FILE

Defendants. ELECTRONICALLY, AND (4) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF SUMMONS

AND COMPLAINT PURSUANT

TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND FED.

R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3), (3)

20 21 Plaintiff Joseph Freeman, a nonprisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Complaint alleging a violation of his federal constitutional rights. Plaintiff did not pay the $405 civil filing fee required to commence this action, but rather, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff has also filed a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.