Freeman
Freeman v. City of San Diego
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20253:25-cv-00104California789 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH FREEMAN, Case No.: 25cv0104 DMS (MSB) Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION
vs. TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, (2) DENYING
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ALBERTO
MOTION TO SEAL, (3)
ZARAGOZA, DANIEL NEIFER,
GRANTING MOTION FOR
GARRETT EDWARD SHEEHAN,
LEAVE TO FILE
Defendants. ELECTRONICALLY, AND (4) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO
EFFECT SERVICE OF SUMMONS
AND COMPLAINT PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND FED.
R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3), (3)
20 21 Plaintiff Joseph Freeman, a nonprisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Complaint alleging a violation of his federal constitutional rights. Plaintiff did not pay the $405 civil filing fee required to commence this action, but rather, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff has also filed a motion to…