(PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20252:23-cv-01522California7,571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BARRY STUART HALAJIAN, No. 2:23-cv-01522-DJC-SCR 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff is effectively trying to challenge Defendants’ actions with respect to a Connecticut state court legal proceeding that he has since settled. Defendants have filed three Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 43, 45 & 51). Plaintiff filed untimely opposition briefs (ECF Nos. 58 & 59) and Defendants filed replies (ECF Nos. 61 & 62). Magistrate Judge Barnes took the motions under submission on May 14, 2024. ECF No. 67. This case was then resassigned to the undersigned on August 6, 2024. The undersigned recommends that the motions to dismiss be granted without leave to amend. I. Procedural History and Background Plaintiff Barry Stuart…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.