Graham

Graham v. Stryker Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20252:24-cv-01411California777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN GRAHAM, No. 2:24-cv-01411-DJC-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

STRYKER CORPORATION ET AL.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 In response to this Court’s Scheduling Order (Sched. Order (ECF No. 22),) Defendant Stryker Employment Company, LLC timely filed Objections (Obj. (ECF No. 23)) and requested modifications to the Court’s schedule. Plaintiff Jonathan Graham filed a Response (Response (ECF No. 24) seeking to maintain the Court’s order. The Scheduling Order currently directs the Parties to complete all fact discovery by March 13, 2026, and all expert discovery by June 5, 2026. (Sched. Order at 3.) The deadline for Plaintiff to move for class certification is July 17, 2026. (Id. at 4.) The briefing schedule is to be determined by Local Rule 230. Defendant requests changes be made to the schedule as to the close of fact and expert discovery and class certification briefing. (Obj. at 1.) Specifically, Defendant requests: • Plaintiff’s deadline…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.