Oruzgani

(PS) Jamshidy v. Oruzgani

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20252:25-cv-00273California1,305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAFIULLAH JAMSHIDY, No. 2:25-cv-00273 DJC CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MORSAL JARNSHIDY ORUZGAMI, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff initiated this action on January 23, 2025, with a fee-paid complaint arising out of harm allegedly caused by a conspiracy against him. ECF No. 1. Because plaintiff proceeds without counsel, this matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 24, 2025, the Court directed plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to establish federal jurisdiction. (ECF No.17.) On March 28, 2025, plaintiff filed a “Notice of Facts” which the court has considered. (ECF No. 18.) The Court finds that the complaint fails to state a claim and fails to establish federal jurisdiction. The Court further finds that amendment on the facts and legal theories it contains would be futile. The undersigned therefore recommends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.