Young

Young v. State Water Resources etc. Bd.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 2013C068559MCalifornia3,814 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/20/13 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

DIANNE E. YOUNG et al., C068559

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 39201100259191CUWMSTK) v.

ORDER MODIFYING

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL OPINION

BOARD,

[NO CHANGE IN Defendant and Appellant; JUDGMENT]

WOODS IRRIGATION COMPANY et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents;

SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER

AUTHORITY,

Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 4, 2013, be modified as follows:

1. On page 6, the first paragraph under the subheading “Mootness,” beginning with “The Water Board raises,” is modified to read as follows:

1 The San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority raises the threshold question of mootness. It contends that when the Water Board granted the Customers‟ petition for reconsideration and issued a new order, this appeal became moot. In reply, the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.