Rashidi

Rashidi v. Moser

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2013B237476California3,555 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/23/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

HAMID RASHIDI, B237476

Plaintiff, Respondent and (Los Angeles County Cross-Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC392082)

v.

FRANKLIN MOSER, M.D.,

Defendant, Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Judge. Affirmed as modified. Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, Warford & Stockalper and Robert C. Reback; Cole Pedroza and Curtis A. Cole for Defendant, Appellant and Cross-Respondent. Tucker Ellis, E. Todd Chayet, Rebecca A. Lefler, Corena G. Larimer; and Fred J. Hiestand as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant, Appellant and Cross- Respondent. Balaban & Speilberger, Daniel Balaban, Andrew J. Spielberger; Esner, Chang & Boyer, Stuart B. Esner and Holly N. Boyer for Plaintiff, Respondent and Cross- Appellant. _________________________________________ In this case, we deal with the intersection of three statutes addressing the recovery 1 of damages: Civil Code section 3333.2, part of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.