Lambert

Lambert v. U.S. Bank CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2013B240359California3,099 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/23/13 Lambert v. U.S. Bank CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THOMAS H. LAMBERT et al., B240359

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BP066539) v.

U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Marvin M. Lager, Judge. Affirmed. Lambert Law Corporation and Thomas H. Lambert for Plaintiffs and Appellants Thomas H. Lambert and Seacrest West, Inc. Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen & Shapiro, Barry E. Fink, Elizabeth G. Chilton and Alexander M. Kargher for Defendant and Respondent. ______________ Thomas H. Lambert and his company, Seacrest West, Inc., appeal from the probate court‟s order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.