In re Derrick B. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 2013D063437California1,008 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Since the Minor does not challenge the basis of any of the true findings or the

revocations of probation, we will focus this section of the opinion only on the procedural

facts.

2 In December 2010, a petition alleging the Minor committed robbery (Pen. Code,

§ 211) was filed in the San Diego juvenile court. On January 25, 2011, the Minor

admitted the offense and was advised his maximum commitment would be three years.

On May 24, 2012, the Minor admitted a residential burglary (§§ 459 & 460). The

Minor was advised the maximum commitment for burglary was six years and that the

combined maximum at that time was seven years. The case was then transferred to

Orange County.

On May 30, 2012, Orange County authorities filed a third petition alleging second

degree burglary (§ 459), assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245,

subd. (a)(4)) and battery (§ 242).

The Minor thereafter admitted the May 30, 2012 petition. With regard to the third

petition (May 30, 2012), the court advised the Minor that the charges in the third petition

had "an exposure of an additional five years and two months."

In November 2012, the Orange…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.