Tatla

Sacramento Sikh Society Bradshaw Temple v. Tatla

Good Law
162 Cal. Rptr. 3d 609·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 764·219 Cal. App. 4th 1224·2013 WL 5321622
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 2013C064277California3,934 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hull, J.

Several founding members of the Sacramento Sikh Society (the Society), a nonprofit religious corporation, donated to the Society a parcel of real property in Elk Grove. The Society later obtained a second, adjacent parcel on which it erected a temple. Sometime later, other individuals took control of the Society from the founders through the election process.

The founders and others took various steps to gain control of the Society’s real property, including recording two transfer deeds purportedly from the Society to some of them. When the Society learned of this conduct, it initiated this action for slander of title against those purportedly responsible, to wit, defendants Satnam Tatla, Vichitra Sandhu, Kehar Singh, Kamal Gill, Gian Gill, Harinder Singh, Hakam Singh, Avtar Dosanjh, Sarban Singh, Mohinder Dosanjh, Manjit Dosanjh (the named defendants). Some of the named defendants in turn filed a cross-complaint against the Society and those who were running it.

Resolution of this dispute turned in part on whether bylaws adopted for the Society in 1996 superseded those adopted earlier. The named defendants claimed they remained in control of the Society by virtue of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.