Harrelson

Harrelson v. Carmax Auto Superstores California CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2013E054435California6,469 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/25/13 Harrelson v. Carmax Auto Superstores California CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

TIFFINI HARRELSON,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E054435

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS1104169)

CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES OPINION

CALIFORNIA, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Ben T. Kayashima,

Judge. (Retired judge of the San Bernardino Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice

pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, Hallen D. Rosner, Christopher P. Barry, and Angela J.

Patrick for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Arent Fox LLP, Aaron H. Jacoby and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.