The People v. Rezac CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2013F064139California6,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/25/13 P. v. Rezac CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F064139

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F10903531) v.

STEPHAN REZAC, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Hilary A. Chittick, Judge. Ron Boyer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Kathleen A. McKenna and Amanda D. Cary, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- A jury found appellant Stephan Rezac guilty of inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant (Pen. Code,1 § 273.5, subd (a)); battery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.