Peter Vrinceanu v. King County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-35529California492 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER VRINCEANU, No. 23-35529

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00423-RSM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KING COUNTY, A political subdivision of the State of Washington; BARBARA AKUA OFORIWAA ASARE, Human Resource Analyst - Senior; DENISE GREGORY WYATT, Labor Relations Negotiator - Senior; ANTINETTE RUGGERIO- JOHNSON, Human Resource Manager II; MARGARET SAFRANEK, Deputy Director Employee Services also known as Meg; CHRIS PARROTT, Director of Vehicle Maintenance; TERRY WHITE, General Manager,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.