Morgan

Morgan v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-3764California1,661 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLEN MORGAN, individually and on No. 23-3764 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00122-MKD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

TWITTER, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2025 Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.**

Glen Morgan brought a putative class action against Twitter,1 alleging that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. 1 Twitter, Inc. merged into X Corp. and no longer exists. The Twitter platform was renamed “X.” Given the timing of the events at issue, X Corp. refers to itself and X as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.