Martin Cicalla, Jr. v. Donna Rogers
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-16014California401 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTIN ANTHONY CICALLA, Jr., No. 23-16014
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01999-DAD-AC v.
DONNA G. ROGERS; ESTATE OF LEON MEMORANDUM*
ROGERS; PROJECT X IT PTY LTD.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Martin Anthony Cicalla, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his diversity action alleging breach of contract under California law.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of
discretion a dismissal for failure to prosecute, Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.…