Mark Daviscourt v. Gwannette Claybrook

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-35397California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK DAVISCOURT, No. 23-35397

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01148-RAJ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GWANNETTE M. CLAYBROOK, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Mark Daviscourt appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion to vacate the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) action challenging the government’s efforts to collect on

Daviscourt’s federal tax liability. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review for an abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.