Mark Daviscourt v. Gwannette Claybrook
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-35397California268 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK DAVISCOURT, No. 23-35397
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01148-RAJ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GWANNETTE M. CLAYBROOK, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Mark Daviscourt appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion to vacate the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) action challenging the government’s efforts to collect on
Daviscourt’s federal tax liability. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review for an abuse…