Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK, Nos. 23-15784 23-16193 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:22-cv-01008-APG-VCF

TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Daniel David Dydzak appeals pro se from the district court’s judgments

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims related to prior lawsuits

challenging his disbarment as a California attorney. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both a dismissal for lack of personal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…