Andrea Wood v. Sgt Investment
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-15939California560 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREA CLAIRE WOOD; TAYLOR No. 23-15939
PACKWOOD,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:22-cv-00513-MMD-CSD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SGT INVESTMENT; CLEMENT
HOLDINGS; TOM MALGESINI; TOM
MALGESINI IRA; ALAN HORWITZ,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Andrea Claire Wood and Taylor Packwood appeal pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing their foreclosure-related action. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. We review de novo a dismissal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).…