Andrea Wood v. Sgt Investment

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-15939California560 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREA CLAIRE WOOD; TAYLOR No. 23-15939

PACKWOOD,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:22-cv-00513-MMD-CSD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SGT INVESTMENT; CLEMENT

HOLDINGS; TOM MALGESINI; TOM

MALGESINI IRA; ALAN HORWITZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Andrea Claire Wood and Taylor Packwood appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their foreclosure-related action. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. We review de novo a dismissal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.