Turrey

United States v. Turrey

Good Law
135 F.4th 1183
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-1956California1,426 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1956 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-05385-

BHS-

v.

JOSEPH ANTHONY TURREY, ORDER AND

OPINION

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 28, 2025 * Seattle, Washington

Filed April 30, 2025

Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Ronald M. Gould, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.

Order; Per Curiam Opinion

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY **

Criminal Law

Granting the government’s request to publish an unpublished Memorandum disposition affirming Joseph Anthony Turrey’s conviction on multiple counts of sexual abuse in Indian Country, the panel redesignated the Memorandum disposition filed April 1, 2025, as a per curiam Opinion. In the Opinion, the panel held:

1. To the extent that admission of a minor victim’s full videotaped interviews was error, Turrey waived this claim by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.