Bondi

Santiago Montejo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 202523-1562California1,229 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CATARINA SANTIAGO No. 23-1562 MONTEJO; KEVIN TOMAS SANTIAGO, Agency Nos.

A206-802-285

Petitioners, A206-802-284 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 5, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Catarina Santiago Montejo (“Santiago”) and her minor son, natives and

citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeals from an order by an immigration judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

Against Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.