The People v. Ortiz-Camacho CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2013C070844California1,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/26/13 P. v. Ortiz-Camacho CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Trinity) ----

THE PEOPLE, C070844

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11F0220)

v.

OSCAR EDGARDO ORTIZ-CAMACHO,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted defendant Oscar Edgardo Ortiz-Camacho of possessing a false compartment with the intent to smuggle drugs (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366.8, subd. (a)) and driving without a valid license (Veh. Code, § 12500, subd. (a)). Sentenced to a term in state prison, defendant contends the trial court erred prejudicially by instructing the jury it could consider dog sniffing evidence to prove identity. We affirm the judgment but we direct the trial court to correct a clerical error on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.